Zed
Full Member
ACR NoobTuber
Posts: 255
|
Post by Zed on Mar 3, 2012 15:20:11 GMT -5
Not sure if this is a new bug or not: Lanz stopped getting 1 power after scoring. I can't remember the exact sequence as we were both playing lanz, he sudden exhausted one of my lanz I think and since even though he was scoring he would get 1 health but no additional power, Same when my second lanz scored ended up with two lanz with no power but 6 health
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Mar 3, 2012 15:29:00 GMT -5
I think This is part of the issue where power was allowed to go to negative, but display 0. So if your Lanz got enough -power to get to say -3 power, you would see 0, and when you give him +1/+1, it would be -2 power but display 0. The devs say this is intended, but really I wish they'd really lock the power at 0 and apply changes from 0 and not negative power, to avoid confusions like this. Petition time
|
|
|
Post by Rob (Roebidoebi) on Mar 4, 2012 11:33:50 GMT -5
+1 to remove the negative numbers
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Mar 4, 2012 12:16:43 GMT -5
+2
|
|
|
Post by jefmajor on Mar 8, 2012 23:03:29 GMT -5
I'm a bit confused about one thing: If Lanz has no power ... how can he score? Pretty sure an agent with 0 power that completes a campaign does not "score".
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Mar 8, 2012 23:19:19 GMT -5
I was guessing one of them scored and the other didn't get pumped. But if he was saying 0 power Lanz scoring then it was no bug. 0 power indeed can't score
|
|
|
Post by mrsuperb on Mar 9, 2012 5:01:11 GMT -5
+3
|
|
|
Post by madstryfe on Mar 9, 2012 17:17:03 GMT -5
Hey is there also a permasafe issue with lanz as well? I tried search and didn't pull any mention of that. It's either that or I still don't understand safe combined with threat. Maybe I'm just interpreting the order of actions incorrectly
|
|
|
Post by Diomedia on Mar 9, 2012 17:30:49 GMT -5
How did it happen?
Threat destroys any agent that blocks (Lanz) , unless they have safe, threat or cunning.
Safe will prevent Lanz from dieing if he blocks another agent.
Was there a different interaction than these?
|
|
|
Post by madstryfe on Mar 9, 2012 23:13:48 GMT -5
Maybe the threat acted before the safe because when I dropped it on him, the block occurred, neutralized the opponent but the safe stayed on Lanz back in the HQ. I guess in this instance its safe to assume that safe stays until acted upon?
Today was my first day using a crime & punishment deck so I just want to be clear on moves that aren't cheesy
|
|
|
Post by Hurdler on Mar 10, 2012 20:01:01 GMT -5
|
|