|
Post by timmah81107 on Apr 23, 2012 21:39:35 GMT -5
I have been playing this deck over the last several days with a very high success rate. I wanted to post it for any feedback and thought it is timely based on the question posted by pryingtuna85649.
5x Forced Inheritance 5x Knowledge is Power 3x Plentiful Crop
5x Scientific Espionage 5x Preemptive Strike 5x Court Order 5x Tactical Upheaval 5x Sudden Exhaustion 2x Untimely End 2x Bitter Sweet
3x Pick your Poison 3x In depth Analysis 3x Family Heirloom 1x Quick Study 1x History Glitch
3x Forli 5x Lair of Romulus 1x Venezia San polo 4x Cesare Borgia
Maybe a few cards should be pulled since this is about 65 cards, not minimum 50 but some were added in from various experiences I've had with the deck so far. Was definitely closer to 50 originally. Thanks for any tips!
|
|
|
Post by thest4lker on Apr 23, 2012 23:18:51 GMT -5
My immediate thought is it is a little low on income cards, even for a 50 card deck. With 65 cards you are probably struggling for income, which is making you slower than your opponent, and making you hope to pull control cards all the time to counter what he is doing. Try increasing your income cards, and you can get your own game on quicker. I also think (someone else confirm please) that you actually have too many bombs in there. 8 big sites and 4 cesare, when you have so many counters to protect them might be overkill.
|
|
|
Post by The Rancord on Apr 24, 2012 1:26:38 GMT -5
Less counter more draw. Also where is ure board reset against official rush? Max. 2-3 scientific ( they are good against other blue/green or blue/red decks, but against others they cost u the game) 3-4 sudden exhaustion 3-4 court order family heilroom u could drop if u go downo to 50 cards.
|
|
|
Post by Ringel on Apr 24, 2012 22:29:31 GMT -5
Nicely controlled Timmah!
|
|
|
Post by timmah81107 on Apr 24, 2012 23:13:36 GMT -5
Thanks Ringel! I must admit I was nervous to see your name show up but it was an awesome match. All the great feedback really sharpened up the deck! I think it is a force to be reckoned with These are the changes I made, still 65 cards but better balance (more economy, more draw, more reset to fight rush, less bombs). I did keep a couple things (like Heirloom, no idea how many times that card has helped complete a synergy if one element in a combo was missing, like a timely Sudden Exhaustion + Tactical Upheaval at the right moment... Or a reset needed): 5x Forced Inheritance 5x Knowledge is Power 5x Plentiful Crop 3x Knowledge has a Price 3x Scientific Espionage 5x Preemptive Strike 5x Court Order 4x Tactical Upheaval 4x Sudden Exhaustion 1x Untimely End 2x Bitter Sweet 3x Pick your Poison 4x In depth Analysis 1x Family Heirloom 1x Quick Study 1x History Glitch 1x Animus Reboot 3x Forli 4x Lair of Romulus 1x Venezia San polo 4x Cesare Borgia I was debating myself on the KHAP compared to others but for what I need it for (economy) it made sense to me albeit with the opponent draw, which can be controlled if it winds up being a good card... But still not 100% sold on that... Happy gaming fellow assassins
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Apr 25, 2012 3:03:49 GMT -5
Looking better man However I have some comments on some of your choices - keeping in mind you're aiming for a control deck: 1) Knowledge Has A Price (KHAP) doesn't really fit - it's a card that gives up 2 card advantage, and I would only ever play that in a speed deck that can outrun your opponent. The longer a game, the less useful income bursts are. If you need to take out early game threats, boosting income to counter is not the answer. 2) Speaking of counters - one Untimely end means you'll draw it most likely late game, at which point ANY other counter will work better. Dedicate to it to take out early rush agent drops (especially PP drops) 3) One Family Heirloom really won't get you to the cards you need (all your single gold cards) when you need them. You need more of them if you wanna use single gold solution cards Good luck, have a look at some of the stuff in the academy forum (importance of card counts and deck building) for some substantiation of what I've been talking about
|
|