|
|
Post by Diomedia on Jul 9, 2012 2:56:45 GMT -5
So if you have a bit of time to kill , try building a deck with this strategy, I've failed to getit to work but I've only had a couple of go's.
Try and make all enemy agents above 5 power so they can't campaign, brother in arms,advanced training etc, pointless , but maybe fun?
|
|
felixschroeter
Full Member
Game Center Name: felixschroeter
Posts: 208
|
Post by felixschroeter on Jul 9, 2012 3:02:24 GMT -5
Sounds fun but relies on the opponent to play agent-based sequences. Not very likely with the current meta and all those sites and counters and stuff. But maybe I'll try it first and report back later.  |
|
|
|
Post by Diomedia on Jul 9, 2012 4:05:58 GMT -5
It's Purely for fun, if your that way inclined  , it loses horribly most times, but like FT. |
|
|
|
Post by kyleess on Jul 9, 2012 12:20:19 GMT -5
I keep hearing that the meta doesn't support agent based decks. And I guess it's true that the best decks right now are site based, but I would guess that I'm playing against at least 75% agent decks with about half of those using just a few sites for support, income, or discard.
I've spent the last day tinkering with a site hate media/order deck and I do well against the current "meta" but I'm still getting thrashed about half the time by agent rushes. Whether it is effective or not, a hell of a lot of people are playing crime and noble rushes still.
I thought meta referred to what people are actually playing and not to what they ought to be playing.
|
|
felixschroeter
Full Member
Game Center Name: felixschroeter
Posts: 208
|
Post by felixschroeter on Jul 9, 2012 14:17:00 GMT -5
@ Kyleess: Good point. But I still think that "metagame" refers to "dominant strategies" even if those strategies are only adopted by, say, half of all players. But maybe that's only me thinking in abstract game theory terms. |
|
|
|
Post by Diomedia on Jul 9, 2012 16:40:42 GMT -5
Put it this way, I had an awesome deck that I almost always won with, I decided to tweak it so I had anti -site in there , it broke it somewhat , then I started to worry about 11 cost cards, so I tweaked it , it broke it some more , The deck is garbage now. If it works stick with it.
The morale of the story is, you can't have an answer to every deck type. If I know the opponent is going to play site rush, I'll pick an anti site deck etc , etc ,but I have no way of knowing what the opp is going to play as we have no tourney structure or competitive matchmaking.
I'm just of to rebuild my deck:p
|
|
, it loses horribly most times, but like FT.