|
Post by DukeBLT on Jul 13, 2012 11:31:53 GMT -5
Nice anti-counter deck! ;D
Was it just me, or did we both counter the same action with Byzantine at the same time and both lay down the site?
|
|
|
Post by UnCL0NED on Jul 16, 2012 9:33:31 GMT -5
We did counter the same card :-) I would love to play other types of decks, but in the current meta it's just impossible to not play a counter or an anti-counter deck yourself... GG
|
|
|
Post by lurifaxb on Jul 16, 2012 9:37:31 GMT -5
Vote for buffing Constantinople
|
|
|
Post by The Rancord on Jul 16, 2012 12:17:45 GMT -5
We did counter the same card :-) I would love to play other types of decks, but in the current meta it's just impossible to not play a counter or an anti-counter deck yourself... GG not entirly true. But u need something to deal with the big players. If u have 3-5 scientific in a deck is that a counter deck? But if there are some Actions that win them the game, u need to stop them somehow or be faster than them. And having counters as a stupport doesnt make it a counter or anti counter deck.
|
|
|
Post by UnCL0NED on Jul 16, 2012 13:08:30 GMT -5
not entirly true. But u need something to deal with the big players. If u have 3-5 scientific in a deck is that a counter deck? But if there are some Actions that win them the game, u need to stop them somehow or be faster than them. And having counters as a stupport doesnt make it a counter or anti counter deck. Party true! The "anti-counter" deck I was playing against DukeBLT was also not really a "anti-counter" deck. It was just a very fast deck with mainly surprise cards. (a bit like Bronto's Flash Flood 2) It's made to outrun all the counter decks out there. Well, outrun any deck in general The thing is that I am so focussed on making my deck faster or play with so many counterspells that a lot of cards that have great potential don't have a chance in the current meta, because there is no room for them, in the way I build my decks atm. I believe Tuism also started a thread about this, and I do agree with him, that it's hard to make original decks that can win you games atm. But it will probably shift in a few weeks... As it has always done.
|
|
|
Post by claireohya on Aug 6, 2012 17:43:39 GMT -5
|
|
nyxeus
Junior Member
"The Pretty Asian"
Mada mada dane - You still have lots more to work on
Posts: 177
|
Post by nyxeus on Aug 9, 2012 17:35:50 GMT -5
You probably won't remember but I played against you the first time today. I use a counter deck too !!!
|
|
|
Post by UnCL0NED on Aug 10, 2012 0:35:47 GMT -5
I remember your name. I only played 11 games yesterday so... My (new) deck only had 4 indirect counters in it, so I wouldn't call mine a counterdeck just because it has Order cards in it. It' more focussed on the agents of that faction... And no Suleman But anyway GG!
|
|
|
Post by lurifaxb on Aug 10, 2012 1:41:45 GMT -5
I played you with that deck yesterday. Very good deck! Nice draw power and counters with Marco is a good idea with bearer of mixed tidings. Do you use that site that makes you draw when campaigning? My anti counter/site deck didn't stand a chance
|
|
|
Post by UnCL0NED on Aug 10, 2012 13:30:26 GMT -5
... Yeah, I remember our match. I thought I could finally test my deck against a merchant deck! But yeah, I have been thinking about the current meta and what would work best in general. I came up with this deck I played against you. I'm still testing, because there are a few things I'm not sure of. I've lost 1 game since I've build it, and that was because of a mistake from my side. I also haven't encountered every type of deck I think it should hold up against, but up till now it works fine. I've been thinking about adding that site, but haven't felt the need for it. It would also benefit an opponent who plays agents... Marco is indeed a very strong card in the current meta. I've excluded Suleman on purpose. But I'm contemplating if this might not make the deck even better! I wanted to use this deck if we were going to start a league on this forum, but I see I can't keep any secrets from you guys Probably gonna post it after I've implemented some of the modifications I have in mind atm.
|
|