|
|
Post by Tuism on Jul 20, 2012 0:46:57 GMT -5
Cards across different colours don't compare cos they're intrinsically different. Colours are specialized. Some decks want the +1 income. I don't think that's a savannah lion situation at all  |
|
|
|
Post by mistervader on Jul 22, 2012 8:55:53 GMT -5
Well, with cards like Cranial Extraction or, in ACR's case, Losing Faith, variety in cards snd picking oddball inferior choices isn't necessarily illogical sometimes. Sure, that's a narrow situation to consider, but it's all part of the deckbuilding process.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ringel on Jul 25, 2012 23:23:02 GMT -5
I'm not here to debate the relative merits of different deck distributions, but considering the care and effort I put into obtaining exactly 5 of each card, the devs damn well better not change that number, or they've lost a customer for certain.
Just sayin'
|
|
Joek
Full Member
Also known as Ephemerial
Posts: 239
|
Post by Joek on Jul 25, 2012 23:40:36 GMT -5
TuismI think Bartolomeo has +1 income as well. EDIT: That's the only one I can find. Thank goodness there's no savannah lion situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by jemy000 on Jul 30, 2012 12:09:55 GMT -5
There were no Savanah Lions in Magic when it first came out either. (What's wrong with a 1/1 Banding creature?  ) But when a game has thousands of cards you're going to get some repeats. I'm sure they'll show up in ACR given enough time and expansions. |
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Jul 31, 2012 2:16:14 GMT -5
Savannah Lion was a concerted and deliberate attempt from the card maker to make a "rare" that's better than other cards just because it was rare. I don't care about duplicates and cards that are functionally similar, but as yet, I haven't seen a card that's better just cos it's rare, and from what I'm seeing in the balancing, I don't think it will happen. So, fingers crossed |
|
) But when a game has thousands of cards you're going to get some repeats. I'm sure they'll show up in ACR given enough time and expansions.