|
Post by ltgab on Feb 16, 2012 16:13:52 GMT -5
I'll check with Marc, but keep in mind it's working both ways at the moment. If you opponent plays a Lassitude you can play Magnetic on your best agent to protect him with all his buffs from "get" effect.
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Feb 16, 2012 16:23:57 GMT -5
So lassitude launches, if I play magnetic personality on a 3/3 agent, it becomes 6/6, then 0/6, then if you campaign with it, at the end of rest it becomes 3/3, as opposed to 0/3? I see... It really is pretty confusing though, I bet a few players will think cheating is going on cos it's so counter intuitive because it involves additional information to "agent recovers power and health", like "it tracks from the moment of gaining recover". Just my two cents
|
|
|
Post by ltgab on Feb 16, 2012 16:39:04 GMT -5
For agents that already have recover, it register their new health and power too with "get" effect. So Rodrigo Borgia, Pope 5/5 with a +2+2 from a "get" effect will always recover to 7/7.
|
|
|
Post by xatria on Feb 16, 2012 19:37:09 GMT -5
It's confusing because MP combines temporary +3/+3 with recover mechanics. Recover mechanics itself I think is fine and not confusing.
What would be better is to fix MP wording/text rather than changing the Recover mechanics. E.g. target agent gets +3/+3 and Fierce until it finishes resting. After resting, it will revert to its previous power and health.
Note that recover keyword is removed but behind-the-scene recover mechanic is the same.
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Feb 17, 2012 2:10:55 GMT -5
It's confusing because MP combines temporary +3/+3 with recover mechanics. Recover mechanics itself I think is fine and not confusing. What would be better is to fix MP wording/text rather than changing the Recover mechanics. E.g. target agent gets +3/+3 and Fierce until it finishes resting. After resting, it will revert to its previous power and health. Note that recover keyword is removed but behind-the-scene recover mechanic is the same. Great idea, but can be a bit confusing and wordy. If worded properly I agree removing reference to RECOVER will help the interpretation.
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Feb 17, 2012 2:12:05 GMT -5
|
|