Zed
Full Member
ACR NoobTuber
Posts: 255
|
Post by Zed on Jan 30, 2012 11:38:59 GMT -5
I wonder how feasible it would be to have a card creation mini game with private matches that you can host - sort of a no holds barred bring whatever your imagination can manage straight to the deck? would be a kind of descruction derby for a TCG - ill raise your 20billion/20billion agent called GOD for my -500billion/-500billion cost 1 poodle card thats a surprise and fills each empty slot with ravenous dogs....... ok so I got a little sidetracked there, but I like the idea of a private unranked match where you can create whatever you want.
|
|
rav950
Junior Member
Posts: 106
|
Post by rav950 on Jan 30, 2012 14:10:27 GMT -5
I wonder how feasible it would be to have a card creation mini game with private matches that you can host - sort of a no holds barred bring whatever your imagination can manage straight to the deck? ok so I got a little sidetracked there, but I like the idea of a private unranked match where you can create whatever you want. Personally, I like draft format. I'd love to see a match where your collection is simply repacked into virtual boosters, you open them, and swap back and forth with an opponent/opponents to build the best setup you can. Too challenging to express in an online format though. The next best would be "sealed", where you get a small pod of boosters which remain separated from your full collection, and make the best sequence you can from them (color restrictions removed). While there is certainly a good amount of "luck of the draw" on these, its also a test of your skills as a sequence builder. I'd certainly be interested to see tournaments hosted using structured/limited formats.
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Jan 30, 2012 14:42:47 GMT -5
Yeah I think sealed formats would be cool, I used to have lots of fun playing booster drafts. But it got expensive. I guess though after getting through all the teething issues we will see how much Ubisoft will put into turning ACR into a "real" TCG, as I'm imagining there is a lot of very new code that'll be needed to run something like that.
|
|