|
Post by KillingSoftly on Apr 5, 2012 2:01:06 GMT -5
Killingsoftly, if it is the deck you played me under your old name, I know what Jeff is talking about. I won that game, but it took me days and days of play time, you just kept hitting me with reboots and copies of reboot. I also asked afterward if you had a win condition in that deck... Anyway, I play s discard/counter games myself sometimes. But I always have some win conditions... You guys are really funny, I read your replies and keep laughing in the same time.. because your memory is amazingly good, I didn't have the deck under my old name...... really funny. This forum is not for judging other ppl, I used the same deck for against Jeff was because after the 1st game, I said I will try again with the same deck when I meet him, it's not meaning that I always use the same deck. come on, take easy and please don't judge before you truly understand what I want to do with the deck.
|
|
|
Post by KillingSoftly on Apr 5, 2012 2:13:34 GMT -5
It really just looks like a bad copy of LeftHighKicks counter/draw RI deck. same as the 1st game you had a bad draw--kept waiting and copy/steal/counter my cards till you have 20+ income, I didn't say your deck has problem.
|
|
|
Post by thest4lker on Apr 5, 2012 2:14:31 GMT -5
No hate from my side killingsoftly, I'm just stating what I played against. I just think a deck with more threat would be a better deck
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2012 2:20:21 GMT -5
4 Actually. And yes those are the ONLY threats. Every other card is a counter card. I save that deck for people who play pure counter decks with no threat against me. I have a list =) Enjoy! How did i get in that list?)) i don't play pure counters, i don't even play order for the matter.-)) just saying. And i am not hateful at all. Just boring game - boring for me, boring for you - can't see a point in it. It took for you 20+ days an a whole deck to win. You could play like three other matches instead.
|
|
|
Post by KillingSoftly on Apr 5, 2012 2:24:04 GMT -5
No matter threat or no threat, a deck can win is a good deck. there is no rule for how to win a game, and there's not only rush strategy. even people who use Lorenzo usually wait till end-game. This is just an example, and BTW, I have about 8 decks now, not only this one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2012 2:31:45 GMT -5
No matter threat or no threat, a deck can win is a good deck. there is no rule for how to win a game, and there's not only rush strategy. even people who use Lorenzo usually wait till end-game. This is just an example, and BTW, I have about 8 decks now, not only this one. really?? that's your creed? a win is a win? I mean, i play to have fun, not to win. And i don't judge this deck because it is counter based. There is tons of decks which is counter-based, but their owners having fun in the process, they have strategy other then "just pull all existant counters against your foe, and then drop some sites and win in 10-7 days". As i said i am puzzled how utterly boring it was.
|
|
|
Post by KillingSoftly on Apr 5, 2012 2:46:24 GMT -5
The funny thing is that there are only 3 Court Order, 1 Scientific Esponage and 2 Untimely End in my deck, It's called COUNTER DECK by YOU. This thread totally went wrong because the 1st game we both had bad draw, Jeff kept copy cards, he needed to wait till 20 income, and I needed to wait cards but had bad luck. Then this time I won the 2nd game, he was pissed off. that's it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2012 2:50:37 GMT -5
Now i am confused. I was talking about jefmajor's deck, not yours. Also i was talking about my match with jeff, not yours.
there is nothing i understand at this point, and i don't really care. Cheers to everyone people. play for fun
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Apr 5, 2012 2:54:56 GMT -5
I am personally against history glitch decks unless its implemented in an interesting concept (buried cathedral etc) that's not boring. But hey it's not up to me to tell people what to play. I can still beat the all-solution no threat decks (most of the time)
|
|
|
Post by KillingSoftly on Apr 5, 2012 2:54:56 GMT -5
I was talking to thest4lker and Jefmajor who said I used a counter deck against Jefmajor. cheers!
|
|
|
Post by thest4lker on Apr 5, 2012 3:08:01 GMT -5
I think this thread has pretty much run its course, lol
|
|
|
Post by jefmajor on Apr 5, 2012 11:30:49 GMT -5
4 Actually. And yes those are the ONLY threats. Every other card is a counter card. I save that deck for people who play pure counter decks with no threat against me. I have a list =) Enjoy! What's the point of that? Just quit and move on, don't waste your own time man. That is why they MAKE their decks like that. I'm not going to reward people for making crappy decks with easy wins. It is very satisfying to counter every card played by a counter deck. You have no idea. VERY satisfying. I only use that deck for people that deserve it. Also, Ariatt, you are right, you weren't on my list, I got your name mixed up with someone else, so I'm sorry, you didn't deserve that deck.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2012 12:40:53 GMT -5
ehh okay) no problem) see you next time on the battlefield
|
|
|
Post by jefmajor on Apr 5, 2012 13:41:35 GMT -5
cheers! That deck that you played that game was VERY well crafted, by the way, and I imagine it would have handled my primary grinding deck pretty handily.
|
|
|
Post by madstryfe on Apr 5, 2012 23:59:56 GMT -5
speaking of winning conditions what type of deck has three 1inf sites as a winning condition(everything else is counter/draw/sudden ex/espionage) I mean, it's a very long and boring way to play for both players If they're buried cathedrals and catacombs then maybe I'd kinda approve otherwise........ Ah well. Life will find a way I really enjoy buried cathedrals if you're lucky and you get all 3 regions out, there's nothing like watching 12 cards just tick away everyday ;D
|
|