|
|
Post by Tuism on Jan 7, 2012 7:02:59 GMT -5
[edit "robots" to "reboots". Damn iPad  ] This guy on the leader boards with a 4 letter name is running with a full on exploit deck. Drops Senatorial ASAP and reboots for breakfast. I've beaten him and lost to him, but I just really don't like that kinda attitude. Venting. |
|
|
|
Post by Raphael Majere on Jan 8, 2012 22:47:55 GMT -5
Devs need to fix 2 things fast.
1. Plazzo
2. Monteggioni
Those are pretty sick.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rancord on Jan 9, 2012 2:12:53 GMT -5
Lora_New also bug user: Palazzo/Pantheon/Monteriggino/RI
|
|
|
|
Post by Raphael Majere on Jan 9, 2012 2:20:46 GMT -5
I do not think we should single out players like that.
It's the devs job to fix the bugs. the fault should not be labelled on the players.
|
|
|
|
Post by xatria on Jan 9, 2012 2:28:23 GMT -5
Agents with on-resolve ability cannot be countered is also major bug.
I think I know that 4-letter player. I was playing my speed Noble Rush deck so he lost before pulling off his Palazzo + Reboot exploit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raphael Majere on Jan 9, 2012 4:29:43 GMT -5
Agents with on-resolve ability cannot be countered is also major bug. I also agree with this. The most powerful is obviously Ezio, Assassin. |
|
|
|
Post by Top Shelf on Jan 10, 2012 0:17:45 GMT -5
Frankly - at this point I expected the bugs to be fixed...
|
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Jan 10, 2012 0:34:21 GMT -5
I don't think that that's not an unrealistic expectation... But it *is* the 10th of jan, and I bet they took a bit of a holiday... It seems like that's what people in the gaming industry will do I hope they're getting their shit together as we speak, though. |
|
|
|
Post by drazel on Jan 10, 2012 10:44:45 GMT -5
I think it is also possible they didn't expect the game to be adopted so quickly by an active community and do not have enough resource allocated to the developpement on this game.
|
|
|
|
Post by joolsita on Jan 10, 2012 11:42:41 GMT -5
Lol... I keep reading "Plazzo", "Monteggioni", "Monteggino" and your suggestions to devs... I'm joking, but it's very funny to read how stranger (from italian point, I mean) people can really make fun of our words or names looool!
By the way, jokes apart, the Palazzo Senatorio can be effectively quite annoying when played with the specific purpose to reset the board (dude, that's really going short in fantasy! BORING!) while having all own things still in place. But this can be solved, hope devs will hurry up since that's a wrong card by any means (both rulings and wordings).
The Monteriggioni site is simply a messy bug only when countered, maybe can I suggest to devs to put additional ruling, like "All actions are surprises. If Monteriggioni is countered, no more surprises are allowed." otherwise I'll continue to hope one day this card will receive proper fix ;-)
Important things, the most dangerous bugs in real need to be fixed are these which comes from cards with tutoring or drawing abilities: in many case (mostly!) I was forced to quit the game because I accidentally launched/activated two similar drawing/tutoring effects. In less words, playing with Red expertise can be a very frustrating experience if you're eager with creativity and technique while building/playing a deck. A Benvenuto launched right after a Benevolent Midwife, in my ipad2, is going 101% for an autoloss since fir some unknown reason I cannot 1) exit from Benvenuto menu or 2) draw anything after mudwife resolves since I'm still stuck on her 3-cards-pick-2 menu, even if I chose those damn 2 cards. Lost many games in that manner... Ouch!
And the Palazzo isn't so much bugged: in case you need, it helps you win against Brontobeuf, just show him a copy even if you haven't any reset!!! ;-) (still laughing... Ihihih!!!)
Actually, against people who abuse the Palazzo-Animus Reboot combo I've always win: most times I play site-based control decks, having always (if possible) a counter ready or, better, a "jumper" or action-stealing spell. They waste their time with me. I have hard times only against RI based decks, sometime a perfect timing is needed (hope always to have a counter/stealer ready). So, that's not that annoying card for me. Monteriggioni, you bet, is a pain in the ass when countered.
About agents with resolve-while-launch abilities, I don't think these cards are bugged. In magic there are some creatures which are uncounterable, and some years ago there were also spells with a keyword ability, named "splitsecond", which protects them from any counter or damage prevention, since they resolves the moment when launched and don't go in stack - a really istantaneous and mandatory effect resolution.
So I keep seeing cards like Ezio as uncounterable agent spell with a free uncounterable extra effect. I know there's Cesare that's already uncounterable (by the way, he "only" resolves as a surprise, not that's uncounterable literally - may I speak again of Monteriggioni? ^^), but once Ezio is fully resolved, you may kick his ass with an agent-neutralizing action when finally on board. And so for all of these type of agents. I'm not really 100% sure they're buggy, I think their innate effect are intended to be resolved by any means and maybe devs missed to state publically their uncounterable innate trait.
|
|
|
|
Post by xatria on Jan 10, 2012 14:30:52 GMT -5
Uncounterable agents is a bug according to a guy who claimed to be a developer. See his quote link in bugs forum.
Yea, I had bugs locking me up on select card from deck/hand quite a bit when I play my discard deck.
|
|
]
