|
|
Post by neasdf on May 21, 2012 23:24:45 GMT -5
I'm just curious about this two cards' use. If I have plentiful crop I will not use merchant ship. As for Rosa in Fiore, it's not a good income booster but it's an assassin rare, just don't know why.
|
|
|
|
Post by thest4lker on May 22, 2012 0:02:25 GMT -5
The fact that it is a site means it can boosted with Judgement day, seeking sanctuary or pontifical high mass later in the game, which you can't do with a plentiful crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by neasdf on May 22, 2012 0:34:26 GMT -5
I see, but if you want to build a site deck, there are better options, such as Basilca di San Pietro...
|
|
|
|
Post by thest4lker on May 22, 2012 2:42:07 GMT -5
I didn't say it was the best choice, simply why you might want to use it  |
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on May 22, 2012 3:23:37 GMT -5
You can't compare an assassin +3 2 cost site with a Faith +1 0 cost site. They're basically not the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by neasdf on May 23, 2012 1:06:33 GMT -5
You're right, maybe there are some spesific deck for those cards.
|
|
|
|
Post by lurifaxb on Jun 3, 2012 0:20:17 GMT -5
If you get them back unto you hand with pandemic , palazzo, gaspar etc. you get the income twice - or more. I have decks that do this well.
|
|
|
|
Post by coolkendude on Jun 21, 2012 10:40:47 GMT -5
The use of those two cards is really situational... I think the best way to describe it is if your deck relies more on actions (i.e. copy deck, counters, Pick Your Poison, etc.), then I'd use Merchant Ship / Rosa in Fiore for the income boost, rather than use Plentiful Crop. Also remember that you only have two spots for action cards while you have 3 spots for site cards so you can deploy more income boosters (at the same time) using sites vs. actions.
|
|
