|
@Altaem
Jul 11, 2012 1:03:48 GMT -5
Post by lefthighkick on Jul 11, 2012 1:03:48 GMT -5
Just curious, was that a network sync issue or did you concede to my PP -> Piri opener? The timing made me think it was a concession. I play five different decks and one of them auto-loses to a resolved Piri, so I've been there.
I couldn't remember what you normally play so I went with my counter-unfriendly Nico variant, guess that worked out. We'll have a better match next time I'm sure!
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 11, 2012 6:10:47 GMT -5
Post by Altaem on Jul 11, 2012 6:10:47 GMT -5
I conceded. I'm really hating the current high counter card meta. To cope I carry all the surprises I can fit into my decks. If you aren't carrying counters and are using Piri for your own protection then I quit for all the wrong reasons.
I was playing on tilt at the time. I think you were my 4th or 5th concecitive loss.
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 0:05:02 GMT -5
Post by Ringel on Jul 19, 2012 0:05:02 GMT -5
Nice to see you in the game. I like your burn deck, even if it does feature Suleiman.
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 2:32:28 GMT -5
Post by Altaem on Jul 19, 2012 2:32:28 GMT -5
I don't even know what a burn deck is. Thanks?
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Jul 19, 2012 4:13:34 GMT -5
Scumbag Altaem. Doesnt know a burn deck.
*picture of him in a brown checkered hat.
Plays one anyway.
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 9:06:24 GMT -5
Post by Altaem on Jul 19, 2012 9:06:24 GMT -5
Thanks for the clarification Pete. Google tells me a Burn deck is one that doesn't use agents or sites it win instead using actions like Papal Influence. Ringel, how did you identify it as such? You quit before I got any burn cards out. My hand jammed and "all" I had were Suleiman and pandemics. Fortunately for me they form a lethal combination.
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 11:41:58 GMT -5
Post by Altaem on Jul 19, 2012 11:41:58 GMT -5
lefthighkick, you have a knack for opening with the one card that unravels my entire deck. Destroy zero strength sites when I'm dependent on those sites slipping under the radar. You sir, are a true evil genius. I look forward to my next instant defeat against you.
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 11:59:01 GMT -5
Post by lefthighkick on Jul 19, 2012 11:59:01 GMT -5
lol, it has seemed that way in our last couple matches! I was playing my current "reaction to the meta" deck and while it still needs tuning, it is performing admirably at the moment. It's also worth noting that I seem to get PP in all my opening hands against you... luck is a factor!
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 18:18:36 GMT -5
Post by Ringel on Jul 19, 2012 18:18:36 GMT -5
Sorry about the slang. I figured you were playing a direct damage deck based on the three direct damage cards you played, and that kind of deck was on my mind.
|
|
nyxeus
Junior Member
"The Pretty Asian"
Mada mada dane - You still have lots more to work on
Posts: 177
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 19:13:55 GMT -5
Post by nyxeus on Jul 19, 2012 19:13:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 21:13:47 GMT -5
Post by Altaem on Jul 19, 2012 21:13:47 GMT -5
That was my wife playing. She informs me you were running a thief deck. Brontobeuf's media deck has given me nothing but trouble.
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 19, 2012 21:42:58 GMT -5
Post by Altaem on Jul 19, 2012 21:42:58 GMT -5
nyxeus, just reviewed my decks to discover she wasn't using Brontobeuf's deck. You faced my media build. It was my primary deck just after the expansion was released. I never posted it here because it's easy to build a media deck and they share 70% of the same cards anyway.
|
|
felixschroeter
Full Member
Game Center Name: felixschroeter
Posts: 208
|
Post by felixschroeter on Jul 29, 2012 1:45:05 GMT -5
Hey Altaem, GG! I didn't think that my Crime removal deck would be able to keep up with your Plebs! However, it was a close and very tough game!
|
|
|
@Altaem
Jul 29, 2012 2:57:57 GMT -5
Post by Brontobeuf on Jul 29, 2012 2:57:57 GMT -5
I shall stop sharing my decks if they generates more trouble than pleasure. :]
|
|
felixschroeter
Full Member
Game Center Name: felixschroeter
Posts: 208
|
Post by felixschroeter on Jul 29, 2012 4:30:11 GMT -5
No, Bronto, it wasn't your deck. It was a concept deck I might be sharing soon that uses every agent from Media and Crime that removes sites or agents (including Raving Drunkard and Francesco Vecello). The card advantage you gain is quite impressive but it's slow as it doesn't rely on surprise.
|
|