|
|
Post by lurifaxb on Sept 4, 2012 7:26:39 GMT -5
With Strongshold's current bug, how do you view it? (It kills enemy's deployed or deploying sites along with resting agents. When it should have killed only resting sites and agents) Bronto had a good point earlier about not playing it since it is bugged. But what do you guys think? Is it honorable to play it in this current state? Avoid or abuse or morally gray? P.s. Selecting one of the above is legally binding - subject to penalty of flocking and tar and feather if not enforced. EDIT: just realized the poll doesn't show up in pro boards app. So just discuss  |
|
|
|
Post by Blind_Angel_(Juelette) on Sept 4, 2012 7:40:55 GMT -5
i don't play it. if i saw it on my opponent i quit. very simple.  |
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Sept 4, 2012 8:10:54 GMT -5
If anyone playes it from the boards, then get a perma ip ban and username ban and whole world ban.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Sept 4, 2012 8:34:54 GMT -5
I don't play it, I can't speak for other people and neither can I ban them from the game |
|
|
|
Post by lurifaxb on Sept 4, 2012 9:43:02 GMT -5
I took all strongholds out of my decks. Even though one deck is designed for agent killing with big site usage. When they fix stronghold I'll play it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by kyleess on Sept 4, 2012 11:23:01 GMT -5
How long was the Papal bug out there? How long did we have an uncounterable Sylvio to deal with? Returning Dante? If you want to wait around for a fix, I can see the honor in that. But the fact is that this is how the game works. You should play the game the way it functions. Exploitable bug control should be up to the developers. If that means that Stronghold is a killer trump card, that's the game, bugged or not. I don't expect anyone else to self monitor their deck building. Hell, most players probably don't even recognize it as a bug.
|
|
|
|
Post by Altaem on Sept 4, 2012 13:20:14 GMT -5
I haven't updated my decks yet. I'm likely to try to play my strongholds as surprises.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Sept 4, 2012 13:58:49 GMT -5
I for one don't want a meta full of Strongholds. But I have no say in how anyone builds their decks, only my own |
|
felixschroeter
Full Member
Game Center Name: felixschroeter
Posts: 208
|
Post by felixschroeter on Sept 4, 2012 15:07:03 GMT -5
What do you think of this: I still play it in decks that are built around the card's theme. BUT: I only launch it in certain situations where it would only have the intended effect, that is: when it would only kill resting agents and when there are no sites in play. I know that I suffer some disadvantage by restricting myself this way but I don't want to ban the card from all of my decks... So: Am I stupid or what? |
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Sept 4, 2012 15:22:12 GMT -5
What do you think of this: I still play it in decks that are built around the card's theme. BUT: I only launch it in certain situations where it would only have the intended effect, that is: when it would only kill resting agents and when there are no sites in play. I know that I suffer some disadvantage by restricting myself this way but I don't want to ban the card from all of my decks... So: Am I stupid or what? I approve of this... Although that means any decks with sites will void your Stronghold  Though I've killed 6 agents with 1 stronghold, and that feeling... It's intoxicating |
|
|
|
Post by Brontobeuf on Sept 4, 2012 22:59:28 GMT -5
I find it sad when a good game is ruined by a stronghold that breaks sites. Most of the time, I quit if the Stronghold destroys my sites.
I don't play it at all until it's fixed, and I don't blame people for using it either. I'm just sad for their lack of brain power.
|
|
|
|
Post by ironcladtrash on Sept 5, 2012 14:50:40 GMT -5
I really don't care if people use it. Apparently UBI thought almost every card was overpowered before the recent update and we still used them |
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Sept 5, 2012 15:49:14 GMT -5
I really don't care if people use it. Apparently UBI thought almost every card was overpowered before the recent update and we still used them *drumroll*! |
|
|
|
Post by Rob (Roebidoebi) on Sept 9, 2012 4:30:39 GMT -5
I really don't care if people use it. Apparently UBI thought almost every card was overpowered before the recent update and we still used them I was a different game than. It was a different game before revelations as well, and it will be a different game again when the next update is released. Apparently Ubi didn't like the direction the game was taking (faster and more powerful), so they decided to slow-down the game as a whole with the amount of fixes they have done. I think they kind-of linked the whole game to the default sequence. As soon as the default sequence can't win any games anymore, it's time for a review... |
|
|
|
Post by Brontobeuf on Sept 9, 2012 5:43:18 GMT -5
I wonder how it's possible for some to beleive that it's fair and fine to play a bugged card that destroys, in opp side, all sites, all launching sites and all resting agents while being a 5 influence site for 10... Is this a serious thread? |
|
