Post by rav950 on Jan 24, 2012 1:25:39 GMT -5
I love the new rewards structure, but I'd really like to see matchmaking based on sequence content.
Cards should have weighting values assigned to them, and you could easily do a rudimentary system based on number of commons (1pts each)/uncommons (2pts each)/rares (4 pts each), with Assassin commons worth x1.25, uncommons x1.5 and rares x2.0 as much as Templar equivalents.
When you make a match, the system should favor someone close to the value of your sequence if at all possible. If the value of their sequence is radically more, they should get fewer credits for pummelling you into dirt and you should get more credits for sticking it out for the loss. This is speaking as a pummeler and occasional pummelee. I think this will encourage more experimentation and playing with weaker cards, knowing that you'll get a more appropriate challenge. Or, failing that, a faster move up to a stronger sequence.
Cards should have weighting values assigned to them, and you could easily do a rudimentary system based on number of commons (1pts each)/uncommons (2pts each)/rares (4 pts each), with Assassin commons worth x1.25, uncommons x1.5 and rares x2.0 as much as Templar equivalents.
When you make a match, the system should favor someone close to the value of your sequence if at all possible. If the value of their sequence is radically more, they should get fewer credits for pummelling you into dirt and you should get more credits for sticking it out for the loss. This is speaking as a pummeler and occasional pummelee. I think this will encourage more experimentation and playing with weaker cards, knowing that you'll get a more appropriate challenge. Or, failing that, a faster move up to a stronger sequence.
