Blue is overwhelmingly strong

[Zed]

this is why i love my black'n'blue deck, lanz, ezio, thiefs, counters and cesare. having a really good time with it at the moment.

and yeah I know ezio is kinda buggy, but its the coolest card in the game, and I only have one, and want to have him on the board as a trophy peice lol

whats funny though is that everyone I play against instantly counters my lanz, but never my ezio (sudden exhaust or something similar)

[Tuism]

Not sure what you mean by "instantly countering", cos Ezio can't be countered. If I could I would

Ezio is awesome, but he is super imba cos he's uncounterable AND kills a site/agent. Which deck doesn't have either? Imba

(imba = imbalanced )

[Deleted]

I personally never prefered blue. First winning combo for me was crime+media. But it really lacked against the first hundred ranks.
Then i switch to crime+scholar, which was based around lance cards.

Now i found a combination which really makes the game awesomely interesting for me. It is not 100% win, but more 3w/1l. Media+faith based around grinding opponent deck to archive+spells which take cards from the archive to your hand+media copy spell.

So any match i basically play whith opponents deck against him. I don't even have my own attacking units

[Tuism]

This thread is probably obsolete, blue *was* very strong before the balance changes that happened last week. Now, there's a much more even playing field, as income was removed from counters, Cesare lost Fierce and Official. Not to say blue is weak now - it's not

I've played against your copy deck a couple times, very intense battles A few times I was playing agent-less decks myself - which I imagine would give you a bit of a headache

[Deleted]

Indeed) The most pain is site based decks and 99% counter decks. But then again i can't come up with obsolete deck. Any deck can be defeated, due bad luck for example))

[Raphael Majere]

It's better now - Blue was too strong before the balance changes made to the 'counters'.