|
Post by bradtastic on Feb 27, 2012 22:39:40 GMT -5
Incredibly, the first sequence (usually with minor tweaks) is fairly effective against a lot of advanced strategies because many tier 1 decks aren't focused on eliminating small unblockable/official Templar cards. When people start building collections, they go Assassin.
I think this is a good thing; if new players beat top 5% people with basic sequences, they'll want to keep playing.
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Feb 28, 2012 0:31:49 GMT -5
Yeah, any deck not fast enough can be overwhelmed by - well, I wouldn't call it first sequence, for one, I've always seen it trimmed down and stripped of excesses. So there are some skills involved there too
|
|
|
Post by Ringel on Feb 28, 2012 2:00:42 GMT -5
This inspired me to try the pure vanilla starter deck. So far I'm 2 for 3.
|
|
|
Post by bradtastic on Feb 28, 2012 2:44:46 GMT -5
This inspired me to try the pure vanilla starter deck. So far I'm 2 for 3. I first experienced its unedited viability during that new campaign challenge; pits it against a bunch of different decks, all superior by the numbers. Then again, the AI plays like a dolt.
|
|