|
Post by coolkendude on Jul 18, 2012 22:22:16 GMT -5
i hate going against it thats for sure. Its just uncommon not even a rare and most scholar decks can easily afford 5. Wouldn't that apply to Suleiman as well?
|
|
|
Post by garcia1000 on Aug 8, 2012 22:57:57 GMT -5
Hey guys I think Piri is too strong because 1) He protects you from counters 2) He allows you to counter opponent
So he does two powerful jobs, not just one. He is undercosted at 3.
|
|
|
Post by lurifaxb on Aug 9, 2012 0:06:27 GMT -5
True. I just think they should do something about your point 2, then he is fine. Shouldn't be able to both stop counters and then counter all cards as well. Otherwise I think he is fine.
|
|
|
Post by falkinator2000 on Aug 9, 2012 1:56:52 GMT -5
I agree that Piri would be better if he was symmetric. However I can see why they went with assymmetric: The green site boosters (Master Architect and the like) are too weak when their effect is symmetric. Revelations gave us updated versions that affect only their controller's sites.
I'd prefer a symmetric Piri that still costs 3. MAYBE, just maybe, give him +1 income to compensate.
|
|