|
|
Post by crazygambit on Jan 6, 2012 15:45:13 GMT -5
Yes, I enjoyed that. That was the first time I tested Papal Bull like that (and discover it failed  ) Sadly my last 3 draws were site boosters.  I don't think it would have made a difference. I had stolen both your Court Orders and had them in my hand. Your window to win was before the Animus Reboot and you came pretty close. |
|
|
|
Post by xatria on Jan 6, 2012 15:49:58 GMT -5
I revised my old Noble Rush deck with Political Patronage and Magnetic Personality. I thought about adding Dante before but felt that I would just use counters to protect the agents.
Faux Pass I think is underrated card. I think it's the best card to play first since it prevents the opponent to get +income (while you get +1) and counter if it's agent or site. Of course, it tends to be useless mid-game.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rancord on Jan 6, 2012 15:57:40 GMT -5
faux-pas is good, but alot of decks just dont use cards that u can counter. So I usually keep em at 3 pieces. Same I normally do with ultimatly End.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raphael Majere on Jan 7, 2012 0:43:04 GMT -5
LOL, I played Tuism in a mirror match, same deck and got a better draw/luck and I won.
It was my first game with the deck. LOL. What are the chances of that? same deck, and meeting each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Jan 7, 2012 2:01:12 GMT -5
LOL, I played Tuism in a mirror match, same deck and got a better draw/luck and I won. It was my first game with the deck. LOL. What are the chances of that? same deck, and meeting each other. I'm telling you it's the matchmaking |
|
|
|
Post by Ringel on Jan 7, 2012 2:10:26 GMT -5
Hey Tuism. Just played you briefly, until a network sync error. Weirdest draw I ever had (my second draw too)
I'm running into all sorts of network sync problems tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raphael Majere on Jan 7, 2012 15:33:19 GMT -5
This deck pwned everything in sight. My version has Ass cards in them. There, I've said it. The only times I lost with it is vs Mirror. I played 2 guys, pwned them with this deck and the next thing I knew; they built a copy each and pwned me. LOL.  By the way, in mirrors, get the Dante/Lanz out asap. The first one to get it out wins. Beyond that, to win mirrors, add change of plan to your deck. Take their lanz. (already fat) |
|
|
|
Post by Ringel on Jan 8, 2012 2:45:45 GMT -5
I'm coming off a high. I decided to play the meta a little and created a Noble Rush deck packed with every anti agent card I could find. I won my first Lanz match, though just by the skin of my teeth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tuism on Jan 8, 2012 3:32:45 GMT -5
Nice, to beat a Lanz deck with anti agent can't be easy I know I've played one a fair bit |
|
|
|
Post by Boobi on Jan 8, 2012 14:37:01 GMT -5
Very nice will test it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ringel on Jan 8, 2012 16:05:22 GMT -5
Nice, to beat a Lanz deck with anti agent can't be easy I know I've played one a fair bit Honestly, I doubt I'd go 50/50 in repeated matches, but it is still better than 0/100. |
|
|
|
Post by crazygambit on Jan 11, 2012 14:18:44 GMT -5
I was testing this, but concluded that it's a lot better without Dante (and the King's Orders). The Dante combo is just too slow and most of the time it's unneeded. If Lanz is already on the board it's really hard to kill by something you can't counter.
Those are 10 cards you can dedicate to more removal (agent and sites) and counters.
I think this is the current deck to beat in the meta. It laughs at Pan/RI since it's so much faster than even the quickest variants. Let them tutor all they want and let Pantheon land. Counter their RI and proceed to win with your 5/5 Lanzs. The game is over in a second.
It's the only deck that can consistently beat my Juno deck (2 out of 3 the other night against someone elses Lanz deck).
Mine is super strong even without Ezio Assassin (since I have none). I think Lanz will be toned down in a future update to read "OTHER thiefs gain +1/+1 when Lanz campains". It's just too broken right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rancord on Jan 11, 2012 14:29:05 GMT -5
Well I won against your juno decks 1 or 2 days ago even with 3 horrible mistakes. And I played Green/Blue. So I think you shouldn overrate it.
Probably a good Idea to add Ezio here. As you im also not a big fan of viscario/dante/order of the kings. Forced charity is also quit nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazygambit on Jan 11, 2012 14:36:24 GMT -5
Well I won against your juno decks 1 or 2 days ago even with 3 horrible mistakes. And I played Green/Blue. So I think you shouldn overrate it. Probably a good Idea to add Ezio here. As you im also not a big fan of viscario/dante/order of the kings. Forced charity is also quit nice. I said consistently. Every deck can lose once in a while. I'd never lost 2 times in a row (and haven't since). I'm not sure how I feel about forced charity in this deck. I run 5x Forced Inheritance and only 1 Forced Charity (all I have). In the early game the inheritance is way better since you need to get those Lanz out in a hurry. Late game I'm not so sure about it either. Too slow. I run Tactical Upheaval and it seems to work out better in thinning out the deck. Edit: Also control seemed to be more dominant lately in the meta and was seen as much more effective than rush. I can tell you this deck is very scary for a control deck. |
|
|
|
Post by The Rancord on Jan 11, 2012 14:45:13 GMT -5
Rush is pretty strong, but the cards u need are expensive, while the key cards for blue are easy to fetch and not needed 5 times in decks. SO the most rush decks are not build effectivly because of limited card pools
|
|
) Sadly my last 3 draws were site boosters. 
